- From: L. David Baron <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2018 09:37:15 -0700
- To: w3ctag/design-reviews <design-reviews@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 25 July 2018 16:37:41 UTC
It's not clear to me from the explainer if the idea is that, if the revalidation returns something different, the resource is *replaced* (which would make sense for something like images or fonts... but not for something like scripts), or if the only effect is that the cache entry is replaced so the fresh copy is used the next time around. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/293#issuecomment-407818094
Received on Wednesday, 25 July 2018 16:37:41 UTC