- From: Benjamin Gruenbaum <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2018 04:42:46 -0700
- To: whatwg/fetch <fetch@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 25 July 2018 11:43:10 UTC
I was going to go ahead and close this since it can be implemented on top of ` cache: 'no-store'` as a lower level primitive and letting users handle watermarks which would require a lot of user code but would be doable. I noticed the crbug @ricea linked to has issues and I'm not sure I understood them: > I'm very interested in what other implementers feel about this. Maybe we can change "should ignore the suspension request" to "may ignore the suspension request" ? I might be misunderstanding but wouldn't that take the capability away? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/issues/689#issuecomment-407725682
Received on Wednesday, 25 July 2018 11:43:10 UTC