- From: Julian Reschke <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2018 09:44:41 -0700
- To: w3ctag/design-reviews <design-reviews@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 24 July 2018 16:45:03 UTC
Looking at a random entry: > 16.10 `Refresh` > > This section describes a header for registration in the Permanent Message Header Field Registry. [RFC3864] > > Header field name: > Refresh > Applicable protocol: > http > Status: > standard > Author/Change controller: > WHATWG > Specification document(s): > This document is the relevant specification. > Related information: > None. "This document is the relevant specification." - I'd say that pointing to a multi-hundred page spec is relatively unfriendly; how about giving the concrete section number? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/274#issuecomment-407473634
Received on Tuesday, 24 July 2018 16:45:03 UTC