Re: [w3c/permissions] Automation: "set permission" granularity (#181)

> The current spec allows granularity at the context level and it is not clear to me what the use cases for such a granularity are.

@youennf I agree. User permission management is an area of differentiation between browsers. For `query`, context level let us avoid making inferences about the various permission models of browsers. But specifying a per-context *set* method would either expose browser-specific behavior, or require us to specify exactly what it should affect. I don't think we should specify a permission model.

@jugglinmike We only want to test standard stuff. If we automate global blocking and granting (which all browsers support AFAIK), is that not sufficient to test our failure paths? Do we need anything else?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/permissions/issues/181#issuecomment-405436450

Received on Tuesday, 17 July 2018 02:09:25 UTC