Re: [w3c/manifest] Icon shapes and masking (#555)

My preferred option is **Option B** as I am not a fan of **Option C**. The reason is that developers already complain that they have to define too many icons - which means that this might mean that they just end up defining an icon for say "ios" and thus ignore generic icon and thus, the icon will look worse on Android and Windows that today.

That is a real fear. PMs might say that one platform is what has top priority and the rest is an afterthought.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/manifest/issues/555#issuecomment-404109746

Received on Wednesday, 11 July 2018 09:43:36 UTC