- From: Matt Giuca <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2018 18:19:41 -0700
- To: w3c/manifest <manifest@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Friday, 6 July 2018 01:20:05 UTC
Yeah, it's not inconsistent, because Manifest's `update_via_cache` is always a JSON member while SW's `updateViaCache` is always a JS interface member. (Though I agree it is confusing.) This came up when we IDLized the Manifest spec; Anne (IIRC) pointed out that we would be running into trouble if we ever wanted to expose any of those dictionaries to JavaScript methods due to the different naming conventions. It was even proposed that we add something in IDL to automatically convert between the two case styles. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/manifest/issues/690#issuecomment-402896790
Received on Friday, 6 July 2018 01:20:05 UTC