- From: Matt Giuca <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2018 15:34:04 -0800
- To: w3c/manifest <manifest@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 31 January 2018 23:34:26 UTC
mgiuca commented on this pull request. > </p> + <div class="note" data-link-for="WebAppManifest"> + <p> + If the <a>scope</a> member is not present in the manifest, it + defaults to the parent path of the <a>start_url</a> member. For + example, if <a>start_url</a> is <code>/pages/welcome.html</code>, and + <a>scope</a> is missing, the navigation scope will be + <code>/pages/</code> on the same origin. If <a>start_url</a> is + <code>/pages/</code> (the trailing slash is important!), the + navigation scope will be <code>/pages/</code>. + </p> + <p> + Developers should take care, if they rely on the default behaviour, + that all of the application's page URLs begin with the parent path of Is this still needed, given the above? Technically, I do, because if you click on "scope" in that sentence, it links to the parent path algorithm defined in [scope member](https://pr-preview.s3.amazonaws.com/mgiuca/manifest/pull/647.html#scope-member). -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/manifest/pull/647#discussion_r165221085
Received on Wednesday, 31 January 2018 23:34:26 UTC