- From: Domenic Denicola <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2018 14:06:06 -0800
- To: whatwg/streams <streams@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 31 January 2018 22:06:31 UTC
@lgrahl brought up in an offline conversation that the way that a writer's desiredSize jumps in response to the underlying sink's write() promise fulfilling can be problematic for large chunk sizes. He thought it would be nicer if there were a way to signal write progress along the way, thus allowing the producer to get a notification that they can write more bytes sooner, rather than later. Concretely, you can imagine something like ```js write(chunk, controller) { return fileSystem.write(fd, chunk, progressCallback); function progressCallback(bytesSoFar) { controller.writeProgress(bytesSoFar); } } ``` This seems a little fragile and tricky; e.g. how does it interact with the size of the chunk as computed by the queuing strategy; having to deal with this new controller method being called at inappropriate times; giving it a good name; etc. But you at least get the idea. I think the next step hear is learning more about systems where this would make sense. The underlying sinks I'm most familiar with don't have this progress-reporting capability. Hopefully @lgrahl can weigh in. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/streams/issues/876
Received on Wednesday, 31 January 2018 22:06:31 UTC