- From: Surma <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2018 09:27:59 -0800
- To: whatwg/streams <streams@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 31 January 2018 17:28:24 UTC
surma commented on this pull request. > @@ -385,15 +385,15 @@ like <pre><code class="lang-javascript"> class ReadableStream { - constructor(underlyingSource = {}, { size, highWaterMark } = {}) + <a href="#rs-constructor">constructor</a>(<a href="#rs-constructor">underlyingSource</a> = {}, { size, highWaterMark } = {}) The more I work on this, the more I think that’s the actual crux: Something as integral to developing streams shouldn’t just be defined in a note. So I’m up for formalizing `underlyingSource` and `underlyingSink`, but defo need some guidance what the right formalism is here. I’ll remove the links. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/streams/pull/872#discussion_r165126671
Received on Wednesday, 31 January 2018 17:28:24 UTC