[w3c/ServiceWorker] should `ServiceWorker` interface implement `AbstractWorker` mixin? (#1268) from Ben Kelly on 2018-01-31 (public-webapps-github@w3.org from January 2018)

From: Ben Kelly <notifications@github.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2018 09:03:46 -0800
To: w3c/ServiceWorker <ServiceWorker@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1268@github.com>

Currently the webidl has `ServiceWorker` including the `AbstractWorker` mixin.  All this mixin currently includes is an `onerror` event target.  AFAICT this event target is not used on the `ServiceWorker` interface.  Should we just stop implementing `AbstractWorker`?  What benefit does `AbstractWorker` provide?

@annevk @domenic do you have any thoughts?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1268

Received on Wednesday, 31 January 2018 17:04:15 UTC