Re: [heycam/webidl] More convenient way to refer to / use "map iterators" (#324)

I'm a little unsure we should use the return type that way, especially given how its counterpart in ES seems to be bespoke iterators (e.g. MapIterator and friends). I might just disallow it as a return type altogether? Although then it's just very unusual since we have no precedent for such asymmetry...

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/heycam/webidl/issues/324#issuecomment-361944871