- From: Marcos Cáceres <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 20:03:21 -0800
- To: w3c/manifest <manifest@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 31 January 2018 04:03:44 UTC
marcoscaceres commented on this pull request. > </p> + <div class="note" data-link-for="WebAppManifest"> + <p> + If the <a>scope</a> member is not present in the manifest, it + defaults to the directory containing the <a>start_url</a> member. For > I can change it but do you have any suggested wording? We should follow terminology from the URL spec (i.e., path segment). > What do you mean? The wording is problematic, or the concept? Apologies, I accidentally missed this line: https://github.com/w3c/manifest/pull/647/files#diff-eacf331f0ffc35d4b482f1d15a887d3bR1742 Which addresses the issue. There too, we might just point to the URL spec "single-dot path segment". -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/manifest/pull/647#discussion_r164948950
Received on Wednesday, 31 January 2018 04:03:44 UTC