- From: Matt Giuca <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 19:54:29 -0800
- To: w3c/manifest <manifest@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 31 January 2018 03:55:47 UTC
mgiuca commented on this pull request. > </p> + <div class="note" data-link-for="WebAppManifest"> + <p> + If the <a>scope</a> member is not present in the manifest, it + defaults to the directory containing the <a>start_url</a> member. For I know, I was trying to avoid using the word "directory" but I just ran with it. Only in non-normative text. I can change it but do you have any suggested wording? > it's still somewhat problematic What do you mean? The wording is problematic, or the concept? I think the concept of cutting off the last part of the path is very well defined on the web (it's the standard URL resolution algorithm). The *reason* resolution works this way is because it allows HTML pages to reference a file in the same directory just by name, which is why I described it this way. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/manifest/pull/647#discussion_r164948064
Received on Wednesday, 31 January 2018 03:55:47 UTC