- From: Boris Zbarsky <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2018 03:34:28 +0000 (UTC)
- To: heycam/webidl <webidl@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 31 January 2018 03:34:50 UTC
The problem is that applying the algorithm as-is to this situation this gives very different semantics to [Exposed] on interfaces and on partials: the exposure set of a member must be a subset of the exposure set of an interface, but you're proposing that this not hold for a partial. Let me ask a different question: What is the use case where you want to specify an exposure set on both a partial and on its members separately? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/heycam/webidl/issues/515#issuecomment-361813361
Received on Wednesday, 31 January 2018 03:34:50 UTC