Re: [heycam/webidl] add a type to represent the undefined value (#60)

"Void" might make sense for attributes and return values, but for method arguments we use "optional". For dictionary members it's "not present". I guess if we add some explanation around it's a good first step, but if we want to harmonize more with JavaScript syntax explicit undefined or dedicated syntax might be better?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/heycam/webidl/issues/60#issuecomment-361156486