- From: Joshua Bell <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2018 10:29:55 -0800
- To: w3c/IndexedDB <IndexedDB@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 23 January 2018 18:30:18 UTC
It looks like we're unblocked from landing this on the Blink side on the performance front. To Do list: * [ ] Tests - including the propagation path from workers * [ ] Verify with the HTML editors that the [report the error](https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/webappapis.html#report-the-error) hook does the right thing * [ ] Spec the stuff in https://github.com/w3c/IndexedDB/issues/49#issuecomment-236649891 * [ ] For `continue()`/`advance()` calls - do we need to update the request's internal state? The [iterate a cursor](https://w3c.github.io/IndexedDB/#iterate-a-cursor) steps never produce an error, so is this observable? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/IndexedDB/issues/49#issuecomment-359885157
Received on Tuesday, 23 January 2018 18:30:18 UTC