Re: [whatwg/fetch] keepalive: Do we need to restrict the number of requests at a time? (#662)

Ryan, thanks for the additional context — makes sense.

> Right, I think the non-enforcement was an oversight we should try to
> correct. In the best/worst case, we would limit to 256 parallel requests -
> but I’m not sure if we’d limit total pending.
> 
> I think the limit may vary on device, and thus be implementation defined
> with advisory (SHOULD) guidance

Seems like a good addition. My hunch is that we could get away with a lower limit. On that note, as an option, we could consider a higher hard ('must') limit, with a "UA's may lower this limit in appropriate circumstance" or some such?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/issues/662#issuecomment-357869624