- From: Timothy Gu <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2018 09:58:55 -0800
- To: heycam/webidl <webidl@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Thursday, 11 January 2018 17:59:17 UTC
This issue is really only specific to the JS binding chapter. In a language like C++, the current system makes total sense. Because #432 is still an open issue I’m not too worried about the handwaviness at this moment. We can of course define a new term to explain why uniqueness is a requirement for these iterations but it’s reasonably unambiguous w.r.t. what it means as it is. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/heycam/webidl/issues/510#issuecomment-357009529
Received on Thursday, 11 January 2018 17:59:17 UTC