Re: [whatwg/fetch] The initiator/destination/CSP table is not exhaustive when it comes t… (#654)

wanderview approved this pull request.



> @@ -830,7 +830,8 @@ not always relevant and might require different behavior.
 
 <div class=note>
  <p>The following table illustrates the relationship between a <a for=/>request</a>'s
- <a for=request>initiator</a>, <a for=request>destination</a>, CSP directives, and features.
+ <a for=request>initiator</a>, <a for=request>destination</a>, CSP directives, and features. It is
+ not exhaustive with respect to features. Features need to have the relevant values defined locally.

Maybe s/locally/in their respective specifications/?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/pull/654#pullrequestreview-86917805