- From: TAMURA, Kent <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2018 12:12:13 +0000 (UTC)
- To: w3c/webcomponents <webcomponents@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 28 February 2018 12:12:37 UTC
Proposal A and B in the document are NOT exclusive. My current opinion is that we should provide both. We should make consensus step by step. 1. Should we support non-element participants? I assume YES. Several people said it's necessary, and there were no objection. 1. Should we support element-specific features such as participate-by-markup, ```<label>``` association, interactive form validation. 1. If the consensus for the above issue is YES, we need something like Proposal B and need to define the details. - ```customElement.define()``` and additional callbacks, - Hooks on ```ShadowRoot```, - introduce dedicated content attribute like [```participant=```](https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/187#issuecomment-369134463), - or something -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/187#issuecomment-369220955
Received on Wednesday, 28 February 2018 12:12:37 UTC