- From: Kenneth Rohde Christiansen <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2018 10:46:09 +0000 (UTC)
- To: w3c/manifest <manifest@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 27 February 2018 10:46:39 UTC
So a radius of 2/5 means that you have 10% non-safe padding on each side, where as the MS guidelines seems to indicate the need for 16% (1/3 in total of both sides). So example for an android icon of size 192px, the safe zone would take up 4/5 (~= 154px) leaving a non-safe zone margin of 10%. Windows seems to prefer a margin of around 16% for fullbleed tiles which is slightly more than 10%, but maybe not terrible much. As can be seem on their examples, some of the icon content actually paints outside the inner (2/3 of the image). ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1101339/36724287-0a71f364-1bb3-11e8-972c-077fba4f1925.png) So with 2/5 we end up recommending 10% non-safe padding around the safe area, which seems to be slightly less than what Windows recommends today, but still an improvement from what they have today. Is this fine @boyofgreen ? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/manifest/pull/657#issuecomment-368828173
Received on Tuesday, 27 February 2018 10:46:39 UTC