Re: [whatwg/encoding] Add Streams support (#72)

I think we do want to expose `fatal` and `ignoreBOM` so if we do a static method it'd have to expose those. I don't like a static method on aesthetic grounds.

I like the tweet idea. We could do https://github.com/whatwg/encoding/issues/72#issuecomment-251284703 as two tweets. First we ask if you prefer a constructor or a static method. In the second tweet we ask if you're okay with separate state if you picked the constructor.

Both with images attached that represent the code samples (ideally with alternative text attached) and a poll.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/encoding/issues/72#issuecomment-368769829