- From: Anne van Kesteren <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2018 23:01:09 -0800
- To: w3c/webcomponents <webcomponents@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Monday, 26 February 2018 07:03:04 UTC
@rniwa if we gave `:empty` new meaning yes. At the moment `:empty` doesn't take assigned nodes into account, only actual children. So rather than `:empty` I think you need something like `:has-assigned` for that. And after that yes, you'd also need something new on the parent at which point it probably gets too complicated performance-wise. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/701#issuecomment-368408027
Received on Monday, 26 February 2018 07:03:04 UTC