Re: [w3c/webcomponents] A way to implement :hover, :active, etc, for custom elements. (#738)

Hm, yeah, that seems like a convincing argument for why this would be tied to "has a shadow root", rather than "is a custom element" or just "is an element" - it's *explicitly* meant to expose something class-like, but without fiddling with the public API of the element.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/738#issuecomment-367501073