Re: [w3c/webcomponents] A way to implement :hover, :active, etc, for custom elements. (#738)

Ah yeah, I guess there's no need to hook this on shadow roots; all custom elements could find this useful.

The question, tho, is just how useful this is over just using classes.  `:state(foo)` and `.foo` look *mighty* similar - what does this different namespace bring to the table?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/738#issuecomment-367485869