- From: Anne van Kesteren <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2018 04:31:16 -0800
- To: w3c/webcomponents <webcomponents@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Monday, 19 February 2018 12:32:08 UTC
I think we should do some in-person triaging for these issues: * Needs implementer interest: https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3A%22needs+implementer+interest%22 * Needs consensus: https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3A%22needs+consensus%22 Reducing the number of these issues by stating implementer interest or agreement early is welcome. Then we can use the face-to-face time for other things. (I've almost mostly removed the v2 label except for things we have clear agreement on. That makes it clearer where the various issues are at in the process.) Another thing we should discuss is how to address the remaining v1 and upstream issues. In particular there's quite a lot of UI/focus/editing stuff that hasn't really been getting attention while being somewhat essential for the success of shadow trees. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/713#issuecomment-366680059
Received on Monday, 19 February 2018 12:32:08 UTC