- From: Domenic Denicola <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 18:13:25 +0000 (UTC)
- To: w3c/webcomponents <webcomponents@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Friday, 16 February 2018 18:13:47 UTC
I guess I find it hard to understand why someone would think of an "old-school image map" as a reasonable fallback for a geographical map. They seem totally disconnected, apart from both having the word "map" in their name. The defining features of a geographical map are not related to shape-based hyperlinking within a raster image. But If your community thinks that those two concepts are connected enough that one can serve as a fallback for the other, then I guess that's fine? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/734#issuecomment-366314715
Received on Friday, 16 February 2018 18:13:47 UTC