- From: Domenic Denicola <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 16:27:33 +0000 (UTC)
- To: whatwg/fetch <fetch@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Friday, 16 February 2018 16:27:55 UTC
Maybe instead of making the constructors support two purposes, their usual one and the copying use case of the OP, it'd be better to add a dedicated static factory method. I don't like duplicating `headers`'s functionality on `Request`; right now those objects are nice and loosely coupled, and introducing indirection methods that couple them together seems like a bad idea when the goal is to just save typing a `.`. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/issues/671#issuecomment-366284792
Received on Friday, 16 February 2018 16:27:55 UTC