Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] TAG review for CSS Typed OM (#223)

> Also, my objection is not that they require proxies were they to be implemented in JavaScript, my objection is that we've been explicitly asked to avoid introducing any such objects going forward by TC39.

@annevk can you link to any reference documenting the level of consensus on that?  Is there a recommended alternative way already defined to achieve a similar design to existing web platform APIs (like [TouchList](https://w3c.github.io/touch-events/#touchlist-interface))?  Without there being a viable alternative ready today, I don't think I can reasonably deny requests to ship additional such APIs in blink.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/223#issuecomment-365613764

Received on Wednesday, 14 February 2018 13:55:17 UTC