Re: [w3c/manifest] ServiceWorkerRegistration dictionary conflicts with ServiceWorker WebIDL (#641)

I could take this but we need to come up with a name.

Service Worker spec also has this

```
dictionary RegistrationOptions {
  USVString scope;
  WorkerType type = "classic";
  ServiceWorkerUpdateViaCache updateViaCache = "imports";
};
```

and we have

```
dictionary ServiceWorkerRegistration {
    required USVString src;
             USVString scope;
             USVString type = "classic";
             boolean   use_cache = "false";
};
```

It seems they changed their API, so maybe we should follow. @RobDolinMS could MS update to follow this new API ?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/manifest/issues/641#issuecomment-363746341