Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] CSS ::part and ::theme pseudo elements (#230)

So my initial reactions to the [explainer / blog post](https://meowni.ca/posts/part-theme-explainer/) (without yet looking at any of the relevant specs):
* the `::part()` pseudo-element feels appropriate; the thing it does corresponds to its syntax and its name
* the `part`-forwarding microsyntax appears complex, and I wonder if it has (or should have) common characteristics with anything else
* I'm a little more queasy about the `::theme()` pseudo-element, since the thing it does feels more like a combinator than a pseudo-element.

I'll see how these reactions hold up after reading further...

(And yes, I was around when @tabatkins introduced these to the CSS WG, but that doesn't mean I remember them!)

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/230#issuecomment-363622098