Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Should the worker be removed from the registration *before* its state is set to "redundant"? (#1273)

Yes, I tend to think that when the worker is "redundant" it should be dead and gone from the registration. I don't know if there's a particular reason the spec ended up with this other order. It seems like the intent was "redundant" means the worker is "going away" based on the non-normative note here: https://w3c.github.io/ServiceWorker/#ref-for-dom-serviceworkerstate-redundant%E2%91%A0

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1273#issuecomment-362629474