Re: [w3c/screen-orientation] Where are terms 'primary' and 'secondary' defined within spec? (#113)

@xfq I think this description and table is great, I have made some suggested edits to first paragraph  to make it clearer - what do you think?  
Also the images are really useful, but I think portrait-secondary-2 should be flipped the opposite way to portrait-secondary-1 (at the moment they are the same image).
Is it worth writing in the table the natural orientation of the pictured device?
I am torn about the landscape counterparts, I do agree that the portrait images on their own have explained the idea, but also it would be good to have all the options there for reference and it's not too many to add...

`When a device is held in its natural orientation, its orientation is represented either by <dfn>landscape-primary</dfn> or <dfn>primary-portrait</dfn>.  When the device is turned 90° clockwise from its natural orientation, its orientation is represented by the other primary term. 
When a device is turned 180° from its natural orientation, its orientation will be represented by either <dfn>landscape-secondary</dfn> or <dfn>secondary-portrait</dfn>.  When the device is turned 90° counterclockwise from its natural orientation, its orientation is represented by the other secondary term.
`

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/screen-orientation/issues/113#issuecomment-446575211