Re: [w3c/manifest] Use WebIDL to describe the manifest data structure (#611)

@domenic Yeah I guess so. 😕 I'm not trying to fix the bad but valid conversions. I'm trying to stop the entire manifest from being invalidated if any element actually throws a type error.

I'm not sure if the previous (pre-WebIDL) algorithms applied string conversions or if they just more strictly checked for the exact string type. If so, maybe there is a case to having that strictness also (which maybe warrants another extended attribute, for string values, to say "this actually has to be a string, not a random object that gets stringified".

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/manifest/issues/611#issuecomment-445700626