Re: [heycam/webidl] Consider syntactic changes to WebIDL to make it more "JavaScript-y" (#485) from Daniel Ehrenberg on 2018-12-08 (public-webapps-github@w3.org from December 2018)

From: Daniel Ehrenberg <notifications@github.com>
Date: Sat, 08 Dec 2018 11:25:27 -0800
To: heycam/webidl <webidl@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <heycam/webidl/issues/485/445483577@github.com>

OK, sounds like I misunderstood. I thought the `_` feature was for operation/method names, but sounds like it's for argument names (is it really needed at all in this case?). Thanks for explaining.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/heycam/webidl/issues/485#issuecomment-445483577

Received on Saturday, 8 December 2018 19:25:48 UTC