Re: [heycam/webidl] Consider syntactic changes to WebIDL to make it more "JavaScript-y" (#485) from Daniel Ehrenberg on 2018-12-08 (public-webapps-github@w3.org from December 2018)

From: Daniel Ehrenberg <notifications@github.com>
Date: Sat, 08 Dec 2018 07:54:43 -0800
To: heycam/webidl <webidl@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <heycam/webidl/issues/485/445468888@github.com>

@bzbarsky Yeah, they would--is there any particular need to use these names as parameters? I'd imagine they are most useful as method names.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/heycam/webidl/issues/485#issuecomment-445468888

Received on Saturday, 8 December 2018 15:55:12 UTC