- From: Daniel Ehrenberg <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2018 08:38:10 +0000 (UTC)
- To: heycam/webidl <webidl@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 4 December 2018 08:38:34 UTC
There's talk in various places about adding built-in modules to JavaScript and the Web Platform. For this, it could be useful to add support to WebIDL for defining a module.
`namespace`/`[LegacyNamespace=...]` could be a good model here, but lots of details are a bit different, as modules don't have all the flexibility of objects. For example, attributes in modules (which will always be readonly) shouldn't trigger any kind of evaluation/execution when they are accessed.
We could start with modules exporting only functions and interfaces (classes). It could look something like this:
```
module "std::foo" {
double sum(double x, double y);
}
[Module="std::foo"]
interface Bar { }
```
Thoughts?
(this issue should be tagged jsidl)
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/heycam/webidl/issues/592
Received on Tuesday, 4 December 2018 08:38:34 UTC