- From: Anne van Kesteren <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2018 23:50:18 -0700
- To: whatwg/fetch <fetch@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Thursday, 30 August 2018 06:50:39 UTC
@jungkees your prose and examples in that last comment match the proposed semantics of this PR. Hope that helps. https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7234 does not talk about fragments at all. As I understand HTTP, the request going to the server does not contain a fragment and a response coming from the server will never have a fragment. Therefore the HTTP cache does not concern itself with fragments. It probably makes sense for the Cache API to follow those semantics. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/pull/696#issuecomment-417208934
Received on Thursday, 30 August 2018 06:50:39 UTC