- From: Jake Archibald <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2018 05:21:06 -0700
- To: heycam/webidl <webidl@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 28 August 2018 12:21:28 UTC
@inexorabletash cheers! I'm on the same track now. Unless I'm missing something, the `async_sequence` would still need generator-like prose to return items and close the iterator. And with that, you get the problem of task queues vs webidl. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/heycam/webidl/issues/580#issuecomment-416563272
Received on Tuesday, 28 August 2018 12:21:28 UTC