- From: Marcos Cáceres <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2018 03:49:31 -0700
- To: w3c/manifest <manifest@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 22 August 2018 10:49:53 UTC
> @marcoscaceres Why is WebIDL not appropriate for defining a document format? IDL defines type coercion rules, so when one does: ``` { orientation: "bananas", } ``` That should "throw" a TypeError... but throwing doesn't mean anything in our format. Similarly, per IDL: ```JS { name: ["this gets coerced to a string"], } ``` And so on... @jakearchibald wrote: > Anyone know the process for this? I imagine it's different to proposing a new feature. We can just quickly spin something up at the WICG. All we need is an index.html file and a collaborative spirit :) When we are happy, we move it back into Web Platform and just explain that we sprouted it from this spec. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/manifest/pull/710#issuecomment-414991832
Received on Wednesday, 22 August 2018 10:49:53 UTC