- From: Adam Rice <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2018 01:55:05 +0000 (UTC)
- To: whatwg/fetch <fetch@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Thursday, 9 August 2018 01:55:30 UTC
ricea commented on this pull request. > - <li><p>Set <var>init</var>["cancel"] to a function that runs <var>cancel</var> if - <var>cancel</var> is given. + <dl class=switch> + <dt>If <var>pull</var> is given + <dd>the result of [=promise-calling=] <var>pull</var>(). @domfarolino Possibly https://github.com/w3ctag/promises-guide/issues/52. I know of one trap in there: because [aggregating promises](https://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/promises-guide#aggregating-promises) uses `Promise.all()` it calls the current (_not_ original) value of `Promise.reject()` which may have been replaced. This makes it unsafe to use in algorithms that are not re-entrant or are otherwise vulnerable to unexpected JS execution.There may be other traps I don't know about. Having said that, we use it in the streams standard and I think it is fine if you use it with care. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/pull/781#discussion_r208787036
Received on Thursday, 9 August 2018 01:55:30 UTC