Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Should EventSource and WebSocket be exposed in service workers? (#947)

@ricea ok

> This sounds like a bug, since it's a straightforward RFC6455 violation. See https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6455#page-44.

But this (the closing without sending a "close frame") would be the implementation of WebSockets that Firefox does in ServiceWorker or, this would originate from the ServiceWorker routine?

I confess to having been confused ... I must assume that no implementation carried out by the mentioned browsers should be followed/used?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/947#issuecomment-411300638