- From: Jeffrey Yasskin <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2018 17:04:51 +0000 (UTC)
- To: w3c/ServiceWorker <ServiceWorker@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 7 August 2018 17:05:17 UTC
In https://w3c.github.io/ServiceWorker/#handle-fetch, we have: > Let preloadResponseObject be a new Response object ... > ... > To [process response](https://fetch.spec.whatwg.org/#process-response) for navigationPreloadResponse, run these substeps: > ... > Associate preloadResponseObject with navigationPreloadResponse. > Resolve preloadResponse with navigationPreloadResponse. > ... > Initialize e’s preloadResponse to preloadResponse. This makes *navigationPreloadResponse* a [response](https://fetch.spec.whatwg.org/#concept-response) struct and *preloadResponseObject* a [Response](https://fetch.spec.whatwg.org/#response) JS object. e's preloadResponse gets exposed to JS, so it's weird or wrong to resolve it with a struct instead of an object. Unless I'm misreading this. :) -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1339
Received on Tuesday, 7 August 2018 17:05:17 UTC