Re: [heycam/webidl] Poorly worded normative requirement could be improved (#548) from Tobie Langel on 2018-04-25 (public-webapps-github@w3.org from April 2018)

From: Tobie Langel <notifications@github.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2018 15:23:33 +0000 (UTC)
To: heycam/webidl <webidl@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <heycam/webidl/issues/548/384327300@github.com>

> That wouldn't solve the problem of browser developers writing bogus IDL. So we would want build-time validation anyway.

Oh, right. Still, wouldn't there be something shareable?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/heycam/webidl/issues/548#issuecomment-384327300

Received on Wednesday, 25 April 2018 15:23:58 UTC