Re: [heycam/webidl] Poorly worded normative requirement could be improved (#548) from Tobie Langel on 2018-04-25 (public-webapps-github@w3.org from April 2018)

From: Tobie Langel <notifications@github.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2018 01:53:22 -0700
To: heycam/webidl <webidl@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <heycam/webidl/issues/548/384212527@github.com>

Wouldn't it make sense to collaborate on this validation tool somewhere upstream? Maybe in Bikeshed/ReSpec land, or in idlharness?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/heycam/webidl/issues/548#issuecomment-384212527

Received on Wednesday, 25 April 2018 08:53:44 UTC