- From: Joshua Bell <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2018 10:47:34 -0700
- To: w3c/IndexedDB <IndexedDB@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 17 April 2018 17:47:57 UTC
Thanks @asutherland ! I'll pursue `commit()`. From our previous testing, it seems like it's a perf benefit even if the individual request events are fired, and I think it satisfies the use cases for bringing this up again (fire-and-forget at shutdown/suspend) `beginBatch()` seems like it could be layered on later. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/IndexedDB/issues/234#issuecomment-382082026
Received on Tuesday, 17 April 2018 17:47:57 UTC