Re: [heycam/webidl] Poorly worded normative requirement could be improved (#548)

That section is indeed poorly worded. My bad.

I'm curious as to what you mean when you say that it was implemented incorrectly on your side. These are really instructions to spec editors.

Do you have extra code that enforces it in your bindings? Does that somehow throw at compile time?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/heycam/webidl/issues/548#issuecomment-381172947

Received on Friday, 13 April 2018 15:31:43 UTC