Re: [heycam/webidl] Is a subclass still a platform object? (#540)

> Prior to 4a8f57e, there were no additional normative requirements for platform objects created by interface objects to be of the same Realm as the interface object that constructed them

Yes, but I believe there were such requirements earlier on.  I didn't dig further back in history to double-check, though.

> What's unique here is that the "interface object" is in userland.

new.target is in userland, if by that you mean page-script-defined.  The actual constructor that's running is not.

And yes, we're talking about both named constructors and interface objects.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/heycam/webidl/issues/540#issuecomment-381152833