- From: Mark Nottingham <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Sat, 07 Apr 2018 01:23:07 -0700
- To: w3ctag/design-reviews <design-reviews@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Saturday, 7 April 2018 08:23:31 UTC
This has been discussed for a long time in the various ways. Current thinking in HTTP WG is [here](https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-thomson-http-omnomnom), although I'm sure folks would welcome further discussion / modification if a consensus position can be found. Generally, this is fairly easy to justify in the IETF. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/239#issuecomment-379448558
Received on Saturday, 7 April 2018 08:23:31 UTC