- From: Hayato Ito <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2018 21:32:35 -0700
- To: w3c/webcomponents <webcomponents@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Friday, 6 April 2018 04:32:59 UTC
Since this thread becomes too loooong, let me summarize here. We have the following two proposals in this thread, basically: 1. fake-shadow-root approach, allowing arbitrary selectors, and treat the stylesheet as it were defined at the beginning of fake-shadow-root. That was originally proposed. 2. "Allowing only compound selector" approach, which can be explained without the concept of shadow root. I proposed this. I don't object to 1, I'm fine to have both, however, it looks 2 has a higher priority for custom elements to me. I'm feeling that 1 is too coupled with the concept of shadow root. So, I would like to have simpler one at first for custom elements, which can be explained even if shadow root is removed from Web Standards. :) If we have a use case for 1, we might want to file a separate issue. For 2, I think the remaining concern is which cascading order custom style should use. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/468#issuecomment-379145299
Received on Friday, 6 April 2018 04:32:59 UTC